Nov 28, 2006

Bond Double Header

To celebrate the release of Casino Royale, one of the best 007 films in ages, here are my initial thoughts on the last two James Bond films, both starring Pierce Brosnan as the picaresque secret agent.

Die Another Day (2002)

After a string of imitators, wanna-bes, and silly spoofs, it’s like a refreshing shot of vodka-martini to finally see the real deal on the big screen again. Secret agent 007 returns to Die Another Day, certainly the most bipolar Bond movie to date. There’s half of a great Bond film here, and half over inflated action fantasy.

The producers and the director are obviously aware that over the past few years the stakes in the action genre have been raised to the stratosphere, mainly on the backs of those little ones and zeros that make up the digital effects that are so common in modern big-budget films. On the other hand, this film is a significant milestone in Bond movie history: it’s the 20th film, and it’s been 40 years since Sean Connery first played the definitive big screen 007 in Dr. No. (Trivia note: the very first actor to play James Bond was American actor Barry Nelson in a television version of Casino Royale.) So the filmmakers probably felt obliged to pay respect to the tradition of the series. As a result, we have one half classic Bond, and one half crowd-pleasing special effects fest. And you can almost identify the exact moment when Die Another Day shifts from one to the other.

The film begins with a wonderfully exciting pre-credits sequence. Bond, superbly played by Pierce Brosnan, poses as an arms dealer in North Korea. Soon, the gig is up, and we’re treated to a traditionally Bondian action sequence featuring hovercraft racing over a minefield. To up the stakes, the mines leap three feet in the air before they explode, and the villains have high-tech guns with exploding bullets and flame throwers. Great stuff, enough to make fans of this kind of thing giddy. Then comes an interesting twist.

For the first time in the films Bond, after being captured, undergoes serious torture. In the Ian Fleming books, Bond was sadistically tortured, but the movies have rarely depicted this. The torture scene is included as a plot element during the title sequence, an inspired idea that, combined with the stunning visuals, makes this perhaps the most memorable titles of any Bond film. After that, the remaining first half of the film was excellent, and classic Bond.

Stripped of his license to kill (something that also happened in the excellent and underrated License to Kill with a similarly underrated Timothy Dalton), 007 hunts down the person who betrayed him in North Korea. Working outside of the British Secret Service, Bond follows the trail to Cuba, looking for Zao (Rick Yune), and crossing paths with NSA agent Jinx, a memorably sexy Halle Berry. The rest of this ‘classic Bond’ first half is a throwback to the Connery era, where Bond had few gadgets, and survived on his wits, intelligence, and deadly skills. There are several nods to From Russia With Love, the second and arguably the best 007 film, including a meeting with a ‘mole’ in Cuba that had echoes of Bond meeting Kerim Bay in that film. (Side note: pay attention when Bond picks up a bird book while in the mole’s office. The author of that book was “James Bond”, and it's where 007 author Ian Fleming got the name of his main character from.) Later, back in London, there is a superbly-choreographed swordfight between sneering villain Gustav Graves (Toby Stephens) and Bond, which positively oozes Fleming nastiness. However, the excellent first half of Die Another Day comes to a crashing halt the moment after Bond gets his gadgets (in an admittedly funny scene with Q, now played by John Cleese), and heads over to Iceland, and Graves’ ice palace.

For the second half of the movie, think Moonraker popping CGI steroids. For those not in the know, Moonraker featured a smirking Roger Moore in the most cartoony, silly Bond film of all. Thankfully, Die Another Day never quite sinks to those depths, though a cheesy effects sequence in the Icelandic sea comes close. Brosnan struggles admirably to keep the focus on the character of Bond, but he’s defeated in the end by trendy MTV-style editing and camera work, an overuse of CGI effects, sound that is cranked up way too loud, and just one damn action scene after another.

It is a paradox of action cinema that too much wall-to-wall action actually ends up being boring. You almost slip into sensory overload, and become disengaged with the onscreen action. The best action filmmakers, like James Cameron, understand this and give their films peaks and valleys that allow the audience time to breathe. The final act of Die Another Day piles on so much overcranked action that the climactic undoing of the villain’s plans has little dramatic effect. After the superb first half, the film ends with a whimper.

So, what are we left with? After the near-perfect mix of character, plot, and action in The World is Not Enough, this one seriously overbalances into over-the-top action fantasy. In spite of it all, however, Pierce Brosnan pulls off an excellent performance, hinting at a depth of character even in the most outlandish sections. Serious Bond fans will love the first half and shake their heads at the second. Casual fans, and fans of action cinema in general, may enjoy the whole thing.

My advice to the producers for the next one: ditch the cartoony CGI, keep the balance of plot, character and action, and don’t be afraid to be classically Bondian. These films are too precious to turn into just another video game actioner.


(Note: Glad to see they took my advice for Casino Royale!)

---

The World is Not Enough (1999)

Finally! A Bond film driven by plot and character, yet still delivering the action goods. For diehard Bond fans, this movie is a long time coming. Fans of wall-to-wall action and those with short attention spans may be checking their watches, but those who prefer a little meat with their thrillers will rejoice in the latest installment in the longest-running film series of all time.

This time around, 007 (Pierce Brosnan) is assigned to protect Elektra King (Sophie Marceau), daughter of an assassinated oil baron, and unravel a complex scheme hatched by terrorist Renard (Robert Carlyle), involving the sabotage of a vast oil pipeline. I won’t say much more about the plot, because one of the joys of this film is figuring out who is doing what, and why.
It’s been a while since I was intrigued by a Bond film plot, but The World is Not Enough did just that. The screenwriters have done a fine job of developing an intricate storyline, with interesting characters, and some compelling drama. The motives of several characters are shaded, delivering just the right level of intrigue, without bogging the film down. The story does unfortunately slow down as the movie approaches its climax, just when it should be revving into high gear, but the ending is still satisfying. I’m willing to forgive a few slow spots when the overall film is so effective.

In his third appearance as James Bond, Pierce Brosnan hits exactly the right note. His Bond is stylish and witty, but coloured with darker shadings that hint at the assassin beneath. In Brosnan’s capable hands, Bond has—surprise!—depth and emotion. He plays the dramatic scenes extremely well, and is adept in the many action scenes. In my book, he has now surpassed Timothy Dalton in the role, who I consider second only to Sean Connery. Will he ever surpass Connery? Of course not, because Connery’s the man, but with this performance, he comes a close second.

The other performances in The World is Not Enough are also top-notch. Sophie Marceau is a memorable leading lady, who has some secrets of her own. Robert Carlyle offers something very different as a Bond villain—humanity, and even sympathy. Renard is no over-the-top megalomaniac, but a ruthless terrorist who is counting down to his own death. Lodged in his brain is a bullet, put there by another double-o agent, that is working its way through his head, destroying the pain centres of the brain. The result is that he can “…push himself harder, faster than any normal man.” But there is an element of tragedy in Renard, a man who is rapidly dying, and knows it. The character of Renard is unfortunately not developed to its full potential in the screenplay, but Carlyle still makes the role memorable. Denise Richards is fine as Christmas Jones, nuclear weapons expert and eye-candy extraordinaire. The part doesn’t give her much to work with, but she performs well alongside Brosnan, and manages some heroics of her own.

Desmond Llewelyn makes what appears to be his last appearance as Q, gadget-master. If so, this is the passing of an era, and Q’s final exit scene is unfortunately unmemorable. Llewelyn, who has been in almost all of the Bond films, deserved more. On the plus side, Q’s replacement, played by John Cleese, looks to be a worthy successor. This is good, as Cleese has signed to do three more Bond films.

Two other supporting performances stand out—Robbie Coltrane and Judi Dench. Robbie Coltrane plays Valentin Zukovsky, who you may remember from Goldeneye, Brosnan’s Bond debut. Coltrane brings tremendous zest and humour to his scenes, as a reluctant ally to Bond. Judi Dench, an excellent actress, returns as M, head of MI6. I always thought there was great potential for her character, and its relationship with Bond. Here, that potential is thankfully realized, after only a marginal role in the last Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. In The World is Not Enough, M is given a far greater part in the proceedings, and is even in the thick of the danger at the film’s climax. I hope that the filmmakers continue to give M more to do in the next movie, because Judi Dench is terrific in the role.

Director Michael Apted here helms his first Bond movie, and does a great job. Both Brosnan and the producers hired Apted to emphasize the characters, and he does just that. He handles the dramatic aspects with skill and flair, while still retaining an essential “Bond style.” I have my fingers crossed that the producers will bring Apted back for the next installment. If so, he just may turn out to be the best director that the Bond series has seen, barring possibly Terence Young, who directed three of the best Connery films and set the style of the 007 movies.

Apted and stunt coordinator Vic Armstrong directed the action scenes, and they are as impressive as anything in the Bond films. The traditional “pre-credits” scene features two impressive stunt sequences, the second involving a spectacular boat chase along the Thames. This chase is tremendously exciting, pumped up by David Arnold’s adrenalin-inducing music score. Other action set pieces involve Bond and Elektra being pursued by snowmobiles gliding on parasails, and a deadly buzzsaw contraption suspended from a helicopter, plus the usual assortment of punch-ups, gunfights, and last minute escapes.

But in the final analysis, it’s the plot and characters that elevate this film to the upper echelon of the Bond series. Sure, it follows the Bond Formula (though admittedly adding a few twists), but while some past Bonds have emphasized gadgetry and silliness over plot, this movie redresses the balance. The World is Not Enough is top-notch Bond, showing the 007 formula humming along at its best.

Nov 20, 2006

My First Meme

I've been tagged by Kathy Kerli for a meme. The deal is that I tell you five things about me that you don't already know. Not knowing the audience, this is kinda hard, but I'll assume this is being read mostly by strangers--

1. The first movie I have a clear memory of seeing in a movie theatre is The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1974).

2. I was born on Guy Fawkes Day in a hospital in Caerleon, Wales, that was later converted to a hotel as part of the Celtic Manor resort, and I had a second wedding reception there.

3. During my first ever open-water scuba dive off Vancouver Island, a 7ft six-gill shark swam underneath me, close enough that I could have touched it.

4. I once spent a week on an archaeological dig in the river valley of Edmonton, Alberta.

5. I played drums and contributed vocals (I won't call it 'sang') in a garage band called Dead City Radio, also in Edmonton. The name of the band was based on an album by William S. Burroughs that I had borrowed from the library.

Nov 19, 2006

CASINO ROYALE

Casino Royale is the first Bond film since the end of Connery’s original run that feels like the stylistic heir to that era. And it captures more of the tone of Ian Fleming’s novels that any 007 movie since 1969’s On Her Majesty’s Secret Service. It is frankly startling that EON Productions, the makers of the 007 series, had the guts to reinvent the cinema Bond this drastically, but in taking this roll of the dice they have jolted the series to renewed creative life and have produced a film of surprising emotional depth, maturity, and genuine excitement. Casino Royale fits easily into the upper echelons of the 007 film series and, more than that, is one of the best films of 2006, no matter the genre.

Daniel Craig debuts as James Bond in a mesmerizing performance. Radiating charisma, grace, authority, and a killer instinct, Craig commands the screen. But there are added layers to his characterization, a vulnerability, a sense that Bond loses a piece of himself with each act of violence, a danger that he may bury his own soul. Bond is not invulnerable and unscarred; events effect him and leave their mark physically and psychologically. We see the first hints of Ian Fleming’s idea that James Bond enjoys liquor, the finer things in life, and women to sedate the damage inflicted by the constant danger his job involves. 007 really goes through the ringer in this film, bruised and bloodied and tortured, and Daniel Craig is utterly believable while still radiating the Bond style and essence. Those who criticized his casting can now hang their heads in shame.

The supporting cast are uniformly strong. Eva Green plays Treasury agent Vesper Lynd with sharp intelligence, cool sexiness, and a hint of buried sadness. As main villain Le Chiffre, Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen contributes a quality never before seen in a Bond baddie – sympathy. Not to give too much away, but Le Chiffre has more to lose in the plot than Bond, and in one scene we almost feel sorry for him. As a result, Le Chiffre has more depth than any previous Bond villain, and it makes the character more believable and ramps up the danger when he has the drop on Bond in a sequence that will make all males in the audience wince. Judi Dench truly shines as M, embodying a tough, no-nonsense intelligence chief who can almost make Bond cower. The Bond and M scenes are some of the best written in the film and it will be interesting to see how their relationship develops in subsequent films. Actors Jeffrey Wright (as Felix Leiter) and Giancarlo Giannini (as Mathis) are memorable supporting players, playing Bond’s allies, though Wright has too little screen time. Overall, the cast has an international flavour missing from recent Bond outings.

Who would have thought that Martin Campbell, director of GoldenEye, could give a Bond film this much of a stylistic kick? Two sequences, one in stark black and white and one in jumpy, hallucinogenic colour, are unlike anything seen in a 007 film before. The overall look of the film is crisp and exotic, and the camera work frequently outstanding, especially in the claustrophobic tight shooting of a fight sequence in a stairwell that recalls the train fight in From Russia With Love, the best of the Bond films. Though the 007 series has never truly been director-driven, Casino Royale bears the stamp of a dexterous filmmaker.

An excellent script helps. Sticking reasonably close to an Ian Fleming novel for the first time since 1969, screenwriters Neal Purvis, Robert Wade (scribes for the last two Brosnan Bonds) and Oscar-winner Paul Haggis have crafted a literate script that is well-paced and peppered with memorable dialogue. Like the Fleming novel, the story has a unique structure for a thriller, with the main story arc ending two-thirds of the way through and an emotional coda (albeit with a set piece added that is not in the book). The final act could have killed the momentum, but it remains interesting because of the attention to character and does eventually add to the main storyline. I won’t give anything away, but the very last scene of the film almost had me applauding. I can only hope the same attention to quality is paid to the script of the next Bond film.

With a John Barry-esque sweep, David Arnold's music contributes immensely to the success of Casino Royale. Deliberately avoiding the James Bond signature music until a key moment, the music weaves in a gorgeous orchestral version of the title song (which is an energetic punch of a rock song sung by Chris Cornell), dropping tantalizing hints of the 007 theme. It synergizes perfectly with the action on screen, adding vivacity and texture to key sequences.

There have been several honourable attempts to move 007 films back to their literary roots,1 but none have succeeded better than Casino Royale. For the first time in many years, “James Bond will Return” reads like a promise of great things to come.


1 Since the Connery James Bond films, On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (1969), For Your Eyes Only (1981), The Living Daylights (1987), Licence to Kill (1989) and, to a lesser extent, The World is Not Enough (1999) have attempted to return to Fleming minimalism.

---
Directed by Martin Campbell

Written by Neal Purvis & Robert Wade and Paul Haggis, based on the novel by Ian Fleming

Starring:
Daniel Craig....James Bond
Eva Green....Vesper Lynd
Mads Mikkelsen....Le Chiffre
Judi Dench....M
Jeffrey Wright....Felix Leiter
Giancarlo Giannini....Mathis
Caterina Murino....Solange

Nov 1, 2006

Dark Water

The supernatural drama Dark Water is, from one angle, a refreshing return to a ghost story with a human story at the centre, reminiscent of classics like Robert Wise’s The Haunting and Jack Clayton’s The Innocents. However, the supernatural elements don’t entirely gel, surprise, or scare as they should, and so Dark Water stays frustratingly out of reach of excellence.

Built on credible performances and characters, the film is really about a single woman struggling to survive, hang on to her child, and love her daughter in a way that she herself was never loved. Recent divorcee Dahlia (Jennifer Connelly) finds an apartment for herself and daughter Cecilia (Ariel Gade) in an old, foreboding building complex on Roosevelt Island in NYC. Desperate to prove her worth as a mother and provider so she can maintain custody of Cecilia, she takes a job that is beneath her talents as a copyeditor and quickly signs the papers for the dingy but affordably-priced apartment. In Polanski-esqe fashion, the building boasts a cast of vaguely threatening characters: specious building manager Mr. Murray (John C. Reilly); monosyllabic, icy caretaker Veeck (Pete Postlethwaite); and two sexually-menacing youths. Joining these troubling forces circling Dahlia is her ex-husband Kyle (Dougray Scott), who threatens to tear Cecilia away from her, and her persistent memories of abandonment and callousness by her mother.

In true haunted-house genre fashion, odd events begin to happen. There are sounds of a small child running around in the empty apartment above. The elevator has a mind of its own and seemingly wants to take Dahlia to the tenth floor, where the abandoned apartment resides. Water begins leaking through the ceiling of the apartment, and the apartment above begins to flood with dark water. And Cecilia acquires an imaginary friend, one that doesn’t like being ignored.

A subtle underlying tension results from this set-up. Dahlia, financially struggling, emotionally damaged and in the midst of a custody battle, must appear entirely capable of raising her daughter. Kyle and his lawyer would seize on any hint of instability or hysteria, and so when the unexplained events begin to affect Dahlia, the stakes for her are raised considerably and the underlying suspense of the story ratchets up. Further beneath this in the narrative are the parallel threads of two individuals lacking and yearning for a motherly bond – one from beyond the grave.

The emotional depth of Dark Water raise it far above conventional horror films, but unfortunately the ghost story within the piece doesn’t ultimately deliver. The solution to the mystery at the heart of the haunting is far too obvious and is delivered too quickly towards the end of the film. This is one film that deserves to be expanded with more ghostly build up, though the coda to the story is both creepy and moving. Director Walter Salles invests the drama with conviction, and the film is beautifully photographed, but he mishandles the supernatural aspects. In the end, Dark Water just isn’t scary enough and is too thinly plotted, which is unfortunate because, given the obvious intelligence of the film, some genuine chills and a meatier plot would have pushed it into classic territory.

As it is, Dark Water is worth watching for its characters and performances, and is a rare example of an intelligent film of the supernatural.

---
Directed by Walter Salles

Written by Rafael Yglesias, based on the novel by Kôji Suzuki and the screenplay by Hideo Nakata and Takashige Ichise

Starring:
Jennifer Connelly....Dahlia
John C. Reilly....Mr. Murray
Tim Roth....Jeff Platzer
Dougray Scott....Kyle
Pete Postlethwaite....Veeck
Camryn Manheim....Teacher
Ariel Gade....Cecilia